Money Management in Forex: More Than Just Trading

Hello there traders!

Welcome back 🙂 Hope you enjoyed this week’s Forex analysis and trade setups! Yesterday’s analysis on the Aussie charts was well received. Let’s see how that develops. The Yen seems to be making a turn as well, so we can already see some good setups emerging for next week!

On Monday I will release the ultimate trading guide for next week and we will analyze all the majors from top to toe! We will go through the Forex charts and look for the best opportunities out there!

With today’s article I believe that your Forex hunting next week will become even more profitable. Why is that so? Today’s article is on Money Management!

Introduction

Al righty folks, the last 2 Friday articles we have been discussing the all the angles on and the importance of Stop Losses in the articles called “The Ultimate Guide On Stop Losses”, click here for Part 1 and and click here for Part 2. If you have not read that guide, make sure to take a look!!

Of course the Stop Loss is just a part of the entire equation in our world of Forex trading. Today we are going to continue with this material, but we are going to look at a broader topic: Money Management (MM). MM is of course a vital topic, and is of equal importance as Risk Management, Trading Strategies, Trading Psychology, and Trade Management.

 Money Management (MM)

Let us start with the question: what is the Money Management? The core goal of successful money management is maximizing every winning trades and minimizing losses. A master of money management is a master Forex trader!!

Money management is a method to deal with the issue how much risk should the decision maker / trader takes in situations where uncertainty is present?

You might ask yourself, isn’t that risk management? Risk management in fact is your choice how much risk you want to place on a trade. You are always in control how much risk you place on a trade: whether that it is 1% or $100, but I would recommend using a standard % risk (not $) of your designated trading capital. Every trader’s first goal is to preserve the trading capital, which is achieved by being very disciplined in the field of risk management.

In Money Management every trader is actually looking at the reward to risk ratio, or R:R ratio in short. Money management calculates the balance between the risk and the reward of the trade.  In Money Management the following definitions are vital:

1)      The risk is the stop loss size (discussed in previous articles);

2)      The reward is the profit potential (take profit minus entry).

How many pips a Forex trader has earned is really not of much value, unless the pips risk is mentioned as well. Anyhow, it would be better to focus on Rate of Return % and $/money earned. This is what all businesses do and all of us should treat trading as a business.

Reward to risk ratio

The ratio between the two is crucial. A trader that targets a quarter of the risk has just won one “battle”, but has just loss the “war”. In trading terminology this means that a trader might have won a trade, but ultimately the win means nothing and that Money Management has set them up for failure. Why?

For a trader to become long-term profitable with a 0.25 reward to risk ratio, the trader would to need win 4 trades to compensate 1 loss. With this equation the trader has not made any profit. Of course this R:R makes no sense: a trader needs to get above the 80% win % to achieve profit. Not an easy feat.

With a 1:1 Reward to risk the trader only needs to win 51% and more to be profitable. In practice it would be better to have 60% wins or more. With a 2:1 R:R a trader only needs 35% win rate.

APR 12 2013

Here are all of the mathematical statistics to make sure you are a profitable Forex trader:

  • With a 0.5:1 R:R… You need minimum 67%+ wins
  • With 1:1 R:R… You need minimum 55%+ wins
  • With 2:1 R:R… You need minimum 35%+ wins
  • With 3:1 R:R… You need minimum 28%+ wins
  • With 4:1 R:R… You need minimum 21%+ wins
  • With 5:1 R:R… You need minimum 17%+ wins
  • With 10:1 R:R… You need minimum 11%+ wins
  • With 20:1 R:R… You need minimum 6%+ wins

Here is a fast way of calculating if you have correct and rational control over your capital which provides positive mathematical expectancy:

Fomula: Win % x Take profit size – Loss % x Stop Loss size

Win % for example 30% * take profit pips 55 – loss % for example 70% * 20p = 2.5 (positive = long-term win).

The smaller the stop loss, the better the R:R ratio when using same target OR the better the odds of win % when using same R:R.

Question

I would like to ask you for some feedback! I think the best way to learn is by sharing experience with each other. What kind of Reward to Risk ratio do you usually target? Please place a number and we will know it’s the ratio! For example, if you usually target a 3 reward for 1 risk, then please write down a 3. Thanks so much!!! By the way, here is a great Forex educational video where you will see how powerful the concept of a 2:1 R:R really is. Make sure to take some time to watch this great Forex training webinar –> “risk to reward ratio.

R:R using Fibs and Elliott Wave

Minimize the risk of Fib trading and decrease the potential stop loss size by splitting your trading into multiple parts. If a Forex trader decides to put their entire risk of the trade (for example 1%) on the 382 Fib, then they have no opportunity to add a trade even if the currency would retrace deeper to the 618 or even the 786 Fib.

Splitting the trade in to 2 or 3 parts allows for flexibility and psychological ease as well: a trader does not have the feeling that they will miss a trade with tying themselves down to a single entry point.

Splitting the risk into 3 positions would mean that the trader choices to split the chosen risk of 1% into 3 parts. The risk can be evenly divided among all 3 parts (3×33%) or more weighted to one Fib level (for example 20%-30%-50%).

APR 12 2013 2

With a 1% risk total, this means either 3 trades with 0.33% or 3 trades with 0.2%, 0.3%, and 0.5%. This is called cost averaging. Businesses used it often: it makes their inventory cheaper. For us Forex traders, it makes the average stop loss smaller and that is great for our R:R.

Forex traders can do the same for Fib targets. By splitting the trader with different take profit targets, they can optimize the profit average of all positions and the entire trade.

The Elliott Wave can be used to decide which Fibs and with which division % the trade is taken. For example for a  wave 2 the trader can choose to put risk on the 500, 618 and 786 Fib with the following division of the risk: 25% on 500 fib, 35% on 618 fib, and 40% on 786 Fib. For a wave 4 the division would be skewed higher: maybe 50% on the 382 Fib, 25% on the 500 fib and 25% on the break out.

The EW can also be used for Fib targets. A trader should aim for higher targets if a wave 3 is expected and for closer targets if a wave 5 is expected.

Position Sizing

Position sizing is important because it allows the trader to adjust it size of the trade according to the market conditions. If a trader takes a fixed position size of 1 mini for example, the loss can vary widely depending on the size of the stop loss. With position sizing that can never and a trader is always in control of their risk!

To summarize:

With position sizing, the stop loss size is not important for risk management. No matter what the stop loss size is, Forex traders always choose the risk percentage level!!

With position sizing, the stop loss size is important for money management. The stop loss size is an integral part of the Reward to Risk ratio.

Here is how any trader can calculate position sizing’:

1)      Determine the desired risk level (risk management) à a trader determines the risk level of that particular trading strategy, trading week, trading day, market structure, and that particular trade;

2)      The trader needs to determine the best stop loss placement: not too close to market action, but not needlessly distant as well (please read the articles about stop losses);

3)      The trader needs to choose an achievable and realistic take profit target –> because we already did an article on stop losses, I was thinking of doing  1 on take profits next week… but it depends if there is any interest. Would you like an article on Take Profits?

4)      The R:R expectancy ratio should be provide a positive mathematical expectation.

For example:

  • Deposit = 5000 EUR
  • Risk = 1% from Deposit = 50 EUR
  • Currency pair = EUR/USD
  • SL = 30p = 300 USD on a standard lot basis
  • Size to open in order not to risk more than 1% = Risk/SL = 50/300 = 0.16 lots

Leverage

Be careful with the leverage you use! A good rule of thumb is  to  use for example 5:1 leverage. That way a Forex trader is not over trading. For example if your account balance is 5,000 USD, then your total is the capital of $5000 multiplied by your leverage of 5, which equals $25,000. A mini lot is $10,000, so that would be 2.5 minis . Use this formula to calculate how much risk you are taking: (SL times/multiplied by Leverage)/100 %. For example if the stop is 30 pips: (30 x 5) / 100 = 1,5 % of risk.

Trading capital

Regarding the trading capital a trader has several options.

1)      Reinvest the profits back into the trading capital. This way the trading capital gets larger and a percentage risk of the capital is realizing a higher return in USD (same percentage risk though);

2)      Withdraw all profits. This way the trading capital remains the same;

3)      Semi flexible approach with some withdrawals and some reinvestment;

I think that option 3 is the best money management approach. Growing your account is a great thing, but you want to withdraw some money once in a while so that you still realize that the numbers are your account are still real and not fake! Then again, withdrawing everything will take away the advantage of compounding your profit. So option 3 is the best value.

Step approach:

What I approach for point 3 is a step approach. This is how it goes:

1)      Use the same current trading capital for your risk management until you have a drawdown of x % or a profit of  x% (the numbers are your choice);

2)      Once you hit your drawdown maximum, you will use the new trading account balance as your trading capital;

3)      Once you hit your profit target, you will will use the new trading account balance as your trading capital;

4)      If you hit your profit target, you can decide the division of withdrawal and add-on % of the profit. So you could choice to with draw 50% of your profits and add 50% of profits to your trading capital. The new trading capital balance would be your old trading capital + 50% of the profits.

Multiple accounts

Another part of your money management strategy is that you want to make sure that you are diversified.

1)      Preferably you are only investing a part of your savings into the Forex trading capital and you have a  decent percentage of your savings invested in other vehicles – if possible;

2)      You have multiple accounts with different goals. This is to spread the risk of having your trading capital on one account. The different accounts can also be used for different strategies and purposes: one could be for long term trading, the other for intermediate;

3)      Keep part of your trading capital on your account. Even though you want to trade with a certain amount of money, there is nothing wrong with keeping a part of it on the bank account. I do not think that a trader needs to put all 100% on the trading account, but make sure a margin call is not needed if you opened a trade with 1 mini ;).


Al righty folks! That is it for today!

Big favor from me. Could you please retweet this article or share it on Linked in? That would be really awesome! Its an important topic and want to make sure that everyone is on board with this topic.

For those who already share regularly, I thank you for your efforts!

Have a great weekend all and Good Trading next week!

https:[email protected]

here_for_you_001


Connect_With_Winners_Edge

Get trade set ups everyday!

The following two tabs change content below.
Winners Edge Trading was founded in 2009 and is working to create the most current and useful Forex information and training available on the internet.

Latest posts by admin (see all)

Winner’s Edge Trading, as seen on:

Winner's Edge Trading in the news

  • Hey Fabrice!

    Thanks Buddy!! Glad to read that you liked the article! 🙂 We are very glad to read that our team has helped you and look forward to continue this in the future. 🙂

    Will indeed write an article on take profits this Friday, so would be so great if you could let me know your opinion on that one as well 🙂 Always appreciate your feedback – thanks again!!

    Good Trading, Chris

  • Fabrice Goeyvaerts

    Hi Chris,
    Another great post for such an important topic … problem is to be aware of the importance of it and it certainly wasn’t the case for me few years ago ! But since joining the Mentoring Program it all changed … thank you Winner’s Edge Trading team !!!
    I use at least a 2:1 Reward:Risk.
    And yes a “take profit” post would definitely be appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Fabrice

  • Hi Dave, thanks for that confirmation! 🙂 very glad to hear that you would be interested in this topic, do next week’s educational article on Friday will be on Take Profits. Yes I agree with you that this topic is very tough aspect of trading. It is not an easy balance to find: what is a achievable target yet one that gives sufficient reward to risk as well? We will discuss these things in the article. Its well worth the time, because it is an important subject.

    Thanks again for writing!! Please dont hesitate to drop a note whenever you have time regarding a trade setup or any other trading question!

    Have a great weekend!!! Chris

  • Dave Hanna

    Yes, please, definitely an article on Take Profit targets. This is very frustrating for me, as I set a TP target based on support and resistance levels, only to watch the trade get part way there and pull back, leaving me with a fraction of what I could have had if I had taken it at the top.